Please wait a minute...
Chinese Journal of Materials Research  2014, Vol. 28 Issue (12): 955-960    DOI: 10.11901/1005.3093.2014.361
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Influence of Fe Content and Particle Size of Carbonyl Iron Powder on Shear Yield Stress of Magnetorheological Fluids
Jun YAO1,*(),Jinqiu ZHANG1,Zhizhao PENG1,Guanglei ZHANG2
1. Brigade of Armament Trial and Training, Academy of Armored Force Engineering, Beijing 100072
2. Political Headquarters, Academy of Armored Force Engineering, Beijing 100072
Cite this article: 

Jun YAO,Jinqiu ZHANG,Zhizhao PENG,Guanglei ZHANG. Influence of Fe Content and Particle Size of Carbonyl Iron Powder on Shear Yield Stress of Magnetorheological Fluids. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2014, 28(12): 955-960.

Download:  HTML  PDF(1777KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The influence of Fe content and particle size of carbonyl iron powder on shear yield stress of magnetorheological fluids were investigated. The results show that the max shear yield stress of magnetorheological fluids with different carrier oil increases with the increasing Fe content, as well as the increasing particle size respectively. A formula is deduced to assess the weight factor related with the effect of Fe content and particle size on the performance of MRF, which was then optimal through experimental approach. It follows that the Fe content of carbonyl iron powder weighs higher than the particle size in terms of their contribution to the enhancement of shear yield stress. In the end, the possible errors have been analyzed, so that to prove the validity of experiments carried out above.

Key words:  metallic materials      magnetorheological fluids      Fe content      particle size      shear yield stress     
Received:  16 July 2014     

URL: 

https://www.cjmr.org/EN/10.11901/1005.3093.2014.361     OR     https://www.cjmr.org/EN/Y2014/V28/I12/955

Number Carbon iron Carrier oil Weight percentage of magnetism particles in MRF
1 98.34%Fe Silicone oil 201-50 70%
2 99.58%Fe Silicone oil 201-1000 75%
3 Special synthesis mineral oil 80%
Table 1  Experiment material and particle weight concentration
Number Carbon iron Carrier oil Weight percentage of magnetism particlees in MRF
1 2.50(99.58%) Silicone oil 201-50 70%
2 6.20(99.5%) Silicone oil 201-1000 75%
3 Special synthesis mineral oil 80%
Table 2  Experiment material and particle weight concentration
Fig.1  Shear yield stress of MRF which has different carrier oil and different particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder (a) carrier oil is silicon oil H201-50 and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 70%, (b) carrier oil is silicon oil H201-1000 and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 75%, (c) carrier oil is special synthetic mineral oil and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 80%, (d) carrier oil is silicon oil H201-50 and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 70%, (e) carrier oil is silicon oil H201-1000 and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 75%, (f) carrier oil is special synthetic mineral oil and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 80%
Number (class 1) Shear yield stress( k P a ) Number (class 2) Shear yield stress( k P a ) Increasing rate (%)
1-MRF-111 36.26 1-MRF-211 37.26 2.76
1-MRF-112 38.68 1-MRF-212 42.56 10.03
1-MRF-113 48.34 1-MRF-213 53.18 10.01
1-MRF-121 43.51 1-MRF-221 46.89 7.82
1-MRF-122 49.86 1-MRF-222 53.18 6.54
1-MRF-123 55.60 1-MRF-223 58.01 4.33
1-MRF-131 39.68 1-MRF-231 41.09 3.52
1-MRF-132 42.51 1-MRF-232 47.12 10.84
1-MRF-133 50.76 1-MRF-233 57.56 13.40
Table 3  Max shear yield stress of MRF of which the particle size is the same while Ferrum content is different
Number(class 3) Shear yield stress( k P a ) Number(class 4) Shear yield stress( k P a ) Increasing rate(%)
2-MRF-111 37.26 2-MRF-211 42.97 15.32
2-MRF-112 42.56 2-MRF-212 50.13 17.79
2-MRF-113 53.18 2-MRF-213 57.30 7.75
2-MRF-121 46.89 2-MRF-221 62.07 32.37
2-MRF-122 53.18 2-MRF-222 66.85 25.71
2-MRF-123 58.01 2-MRF-223 71.62 23.46
2-MRF-131 41.09 2-MRF-231 47.45 15.48
2-MRF-132 47.12 2-MRF-232 56.88 20.71
2-MRF-133 57.56 2-MRF-233 65.68 14.11
Table 4  Max shear yield stress of MRF of which the magnetic particle size is different
Fig.2  Validation of shear yield stress of MRF which has different carrier oil and different particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder (a) carrier oil is special synthetic mineral oil and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 70%, (b) carrier oil is special synthetic mineral oil and the particle concentration of Carbonyl Iron Powder is 75%
Number Max shear yield stress τ y /kPa Particle size p /μm Saturation magnetization M s /(emu/g)
2-MRF-131 41.09 2.50 262.67
3-MRF-1 48.13 5.70 249.07
2-MRF-132 49.66 2.50 262.67
3-MRF-2 57.30 5.70 249.07
Table 5  Basic characteristics of MRF samples
1 TANG Long,LU Liping, YUE En, LUO Shunan, ZHANG Ping, Research and applications of magnetorheological fluids, Journal of Chongqing University of Technology, 27(12), 44(2013)
1 (唐 龙, 卢利平, 岳 恩, 罗顺安, 张平, 磁流变液的研究与应用, 重庆理工大学学报, 27(12), 44(2013))
2 JU Benxiang,YU Miao, FU Jie, Influence of carbon content of carbonyl iron powder on MR effect of magnetorheological elastomer, Journal of Chongqing University, 35(8), 17(2012)
2 (居本祥, 于 淼, 浮 洁, 羰基铁粉的C含量对磁流变弹性体磁流变效应的影响, 重庆大学学报, 35(8), 17(2012))
3 R. F. Ierardi, A. J. F. Bombard,Off-state viscosity and yield stress optimization of magnetorheological fluids: a mixture design of experiments approach, 11th Conference on Electrorheological Fluids and Magnetorheological Suspensions, 2009
4 GONG Zhiwei,DU Chengbin, YU Guojun, Comparison of the characteristics of carbonyl iron-based magnetorheological fluid with single-sized and dual-sized particles, Function material, V(42), 809(2011)
4 (龚志伟, 杜成斌, 于国军, 单一粒径与两种粒径羰基铁粉磁流变液特性的实验比较研究, 功能材料, V(42), 809(2011))
5 CUAN Hongliang,ZHANG Jinqiu, KONG Yanan, ZHANG Jian, The influence of nano-Fe3O4addition on the performance of magnetorhelogical fluid for tracked vehicle, J Magn Mater Devices, 42(3), 34(2011)
5 (爨红亮, 张进秋, 孔亚男, 张 建, 纳米Fe3O4对装甲车辆用磁流变液性能的影响, 磁性材料及器件, 42(3), 34(2011))
6 I. G. Kim, J. E. Kim, Y. D. Liu, H. J. Choi,Polyamide Coated Soft Magnetic Microspheres and Their Magnetorheology, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 48(11), 3446(2012)
7 Y. D. Liu, J. Lee, S. B. Choi, H. J. Choi,Silica-coated carbonyl iron microsphere based magnetorheological?uid and its damping force characteristics, Smart Materials and Structures, 22, (2013)
8 H. H. Sim, S. H. Kwon, H.J.Choi,Xanthan gum-coated soft magnetic carbonyl iron composite particles and their magnetorheology, Colloid Polym Sci, 963(2013)
9 Y. D. Liu, F. F. Fang, H. J. Choi,Core-shell-structured silica-coated magnetic carbonyl iron microbead and its magnetorheology with anti-acidic characteristics, Colloid Polym Sci, 289, 1295(2011)
[1] MAO Jianjun, FU Tong, PAN Hucheng, TENG Changqing, ZHANG Wei, XIE Dongsheng, WU Lu. Kr Ions Irradiation Damage Behavior of AlNbMoZrB Refractory High-entropy Alloy[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(9): 641-648.
[2] SONG Lifang, YAN Jiahao, ZHANG Diankang, XUE Cheng, XIA Huiyun, NIU Yanhui. Carbon Dioxide Adsorption Capacity of Alkali-metal Cation Dopped MIL125[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(9): 649-654.
[3] ZHAO Zhengxiang, LIAO Luhai, XU Fanghong, ZHANG Wei, LI Jingyuan. Hot Deformation Behavior and Microstructue Evolution of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel 24Cr-22Ni-7Mo-0.4N[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(9): 655-667.
[4] SHAO Hongmei, CUI Yong, XU Wendi, ZHANG Wei, SHEN Xiaoyi, ZHAI Yuchun. Template-free Hydrothermal Preparation and Adsorption Capacity of Hollow Spherical AlOOH[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(9): 675-684.
[5] XING Dingqin, TU Jian, LUO Sen, ZHOU Zhiming. Effect of Different C Contents on Microstructure and Properties of VCoNi Medium-entropy Alloys[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(9): 685-696.
[6] OUYANG Kangxin, ZHOU Da, YANG Yufan, ZHANG Lei. Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Mg-Y-Er-Ni Alloy with Long Period Stacking Ordered Phases[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(9): 697-705.
[7] XU Lijun, ZHENG Ce, FENG Xiaohui, HUANG Qiuyan, LI Yingju, YANG Yuansheng. Effects of Directional Recrystallization on Microstructure and Superelastic Property of Hot-rolled Cu71Al18Mn11 Alloy[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(8): 571-580.
[8] XIONG Shiqi, LIU Enze, TAN Zheng, NING Likui, TONG Jian, ZHENG Zhi, LI Haiying. Effect of Solution Heat Treatment on Microstructure of DZ125L Superalloy with Low Segregation[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(8): 603-613.
[9] LIU Jihao, CHI Hongxiao, WU Huibin, MA Dangshen, ZHOU Jian, XU Huixia. Heat Treatment Related Microstructure Evolution and Low Hardness Issue of Spray Forming M3 High Speed Steel[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(8): 625-632.
[10] YOU Baodong, ZHU Mingwei, YANG Pengju, HE Jie. Research Progress in Preparation of Porous Metal Materials by Alloy Phase Separation[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(8): 561-570.
[11] REN Fuyan, OUYANG Erming. Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by g-C3N4 Modified Bi2O3[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(8): 633-640.
[12] WANG Hao, CUI Junjun, ZHAO Mingjiu. Recrystallization and Grain Growth Behavior for Strip and Foil of Ni-based Superalloy GH3536[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(7): 535-542.
[13] LIU Mingzhu, FAN Rao, ZHANG Xiaoyu, MA Zeyuan, LIANG Chengyang, CAO Ying, GENG Shitong, LI Ling. Effect of Photoanode Film Thickness of SnO2 as Scattering Layer on the Photovoltaic Performance of Quantum Dot Dye-sensitized Solar Cells[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(7): 554-560.
[14] QIN Heyong, LI Zhentuan, ZHAO Guangpu, ZHANG Wenyun, ZHANG Xiaomin. Effect of Solution Temperature on Mechanical Properties and γ' Phase of GH4742 Superalloy[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(7): 502-510.
[15] GUO Fei, ZHENG Chengwu, WANG Pei, LI Dianzhong. Effect of Rare Earth Elements on Austenite-Ferrite Phase Transformation Kinetics of Low Carbon Steels[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(7): 495-501.
No Suggested Reading articles found!