Please wait a minute...
材料研究学报  2026, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 595-604    DOI: 10.11901/1005.3093.2026.140
  钛合金专题 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
热加工对紧固件用Ti55531棒材断裂韧性的影响
宋肖桐1, 陈思旭2, 邱建科2(), 胡明2, 张明杰2, 昝晓东2, 雷家峰2
1.东北大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110819
2.中国科学院金属研究所 沈阳 110016
Effect of Thermomechanical Processing on Fracture Toughness of Ti55531 Alloy Bar for Fasteners
SONG Xiaotong1, CHEN Sixu2, QIU Jianke2(), HU Ming2, ZHANG Mingjie2, ZAN Xiaodong2, LEI Jiafeng2
1.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2.Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
引用本文:

宋肖桐, 陈思旭, 邱建科, 胡明, 张明杰, 昝晓东, 雷家峰. 热加工对紧固件用Ti55531棒材断裂韧性的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(8): 595-604.
Xiaotong SONG, Sixu CHEN, Jianke QIU, Ming HU, Mingjie ZHANG, Xiaodong ZAN, Jiafeng LEI. Effect of Thermomechanical Processing on Fracture Toughness of Ti55531 Alloy Bar for Fasteners[J]. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2026, 40(8): 595-604.

全文: PDF(24142 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

将轧制态和轧制+拉拔态Ti55531合金棒材进行固溶时效处理,用配有EDAX系统的Verios 5UC场发射扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、TES-105D电子万能实验机、Instron 8874液压疲劳实验机、电子背散射衍射(EBSD)和Image Pro-Plus软件等手段表征其显微组织、织构特征和断裂韧性,研究了热加工对其断裂韧性的影响和变形工艺影响裂纹扩展路径的机制。结果表明:热变形使这种棒材的组织细化、均匀化和使其中的初生α相显著细化。轧制+拉拔变形使棒材中形成较强的β相<110>和α相<0001>纤维织构。与ϕ61 mm轧棒相比,ϕ12 mm棒材在保持一定强度的同时塑韧性提高了。用轧制+拉拔制备的ϕ12 mm棒材强韧性匹配最优,其断裂韧性达到34.63 MPa·m1/2,比纯轧制的ϕ61和ϕ12 mm棒材分别提高43.5%和19.7%。轧制+拉拔态棒材试样中的强织构诱发了显著的裂纹偏折从而实现了几何增韧。

关键词 金属材料断裂韧性显微组织Ti55531合金    
Abstract

The specified two type of rolled and rolled+drawn near β-Ti based alloy Ti-55531 bars respectively were subjected to solution at 760 oC for 1 h and air-cooled, followed by aging at 560 oC for 4 h then air-cooling. Then their microstructure, texture characteristics, and fracture toughness were systematically investigated, in terms of the influence of different thermomechanical processing routes on the crack propagation path. The results show that thermomechanical deformation can significantly refine the primary α-phase, leading to a refined and more homogeneous microstructure of the alloy bars. The bars subjected to drawing deformation exhibit pronounced fiber textures: β-phase <110>//AD and α phase <0001>//AD. Compared with the ϕ61 mm rolled bar, the ϕ12 mm bars exhibit improved plasticity and toughness while maintaining comparable strength. The ϕ12 mm bar prepared by rolling+drawing demonstrates the best strength-toughness balance, with a fracture toughness of 34.63 MPa·m1/2, which is 43.5% and 19.7% higher than those of the ϕ61 mm and ϕ12 mm merely rolled bars, respectively. Furthermore, crack propagation analysis indicates that the existed strong texture in the rolled+drawn bars is conductive to triggering the crack deflection effect significantly, thereby achieving geometric toughening.

Key wordsmetallic materials    fracture toughness    microstructure    Ti55531 alloy
收稿日期: 2026-03-16     
ZTFLH:  TG146.2+3  
基金资助:国家重点研发计划(2022YFB3708300);中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2022188)
通讯作者: 邱建科,研究员,jkqiu@imr.ac.cn,研究方向为钛合金
Corresponding author: QIU Jianke, Tel: (024)23971958, E-mail: jkqiu@imr.ac.cn
作者简介: 宋肖桐,男,2002年生,硕士
ElementsAlMoVCrZrFeOHNTi
Content5.324.775.072.921.110.380.110.00370.0089Bal.
表1  Ti55531合金的成分
图1  热变形工艺路线示意图、R61棒材的显微组织以及热处理工艺示意图
图2  显微组织分析取样和拉伸和断裂韧性试样取样的示意图
图3  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材的显微组织和晶体取向
图4  固溶时效热处理后不同加工状态Ti55531棒材中αp相和αs相尺寸的统计
图5  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材热处理后的α相和β相的极图
SpecimenRm / MPaRP0.2 / MPaA / %KIC / MPa·m1/2
R61138913561324.13
R121299127619.528.94
D121356131616.334.63
表2  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材的拉伸和断裂韧性
图6  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材的载荷-位移曲线
图7  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材SEB试样的断口形貌体视图以及SEM图
图8  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材SEB试样的裂纹扩展路径SEM图
图9  不同加工状态Ti55531棒材的显微组织影响裂纹扩展路径的SEM形貌图和相应的示意图
[1] Williams J C, Boyer R R. Opportunities and issues in the application of titanium alloys for aerospace components [J]. Metals, 2020, 10(6): 705
doi: 10.3390/met10060705
[2] Rominiyi A L, Mashinini P M. Processing and machining of aerospace metals [A]. Mouritz A P. Introduction to Aerospace Materials [M]. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing, 2012: 154
[3] Toor P M. Structural Integrity of Fasteners [M]. Philadelphia: ASTM International, 1995
[4] Connelly M B. Failures of mechanical fasteners [A]. MillerBA, ShipleyRJ, ParringtonRJ, et al. Analysis and Prevention of Component and Equipment Failures [M]. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2021: 379
[5] Gulyaev A P. Strength and toughness of metallic materials [J]. Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 1973, 15(10): 912
doi: 10.1007/BF00656088
[6] Banerjee D, Williams J C. Perspectives on titanium science and technology [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61(3): 844
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043
[7] Zhao H, Xin S W, Zhou W, et al. The influence of heat processing on the microstructure and properties of a high-strength titanium alloy [J]. Mater. Des., 2025, 257: 114554
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114554
[8] Zherebtsov S V, Dyakonov G S, Salem A A, et al. Evolution of grain and subgrain structure during cold rolling of commercial-purity titanium [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2011, 528A(9) : 3474
[9] Xu J W, Zeng W D, Zhou D D, et al. Influence of alpha/beta processing on fracture toughness for a two-phase titanium alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 731A: 85
[10] Hamajima T, Lütjering G, Weissmann S. Importance of slip mode for dispersion-hardened β-titanium alloys [J]. Metall. Trans., 1973, 4(3): 847
[11] Mora L, Quesne C, Penelle R. Relationships among thermomechanical treatments, microstructure, and tensile properties of a near beta-titanium alloy: β-CEZ: Part II. Relationships between thermomechanical treatments and tensile properties [J]. J. Mater. Res., 1996, 11(1): 89
doi: 10.1557/JMR.1996.0012
[12] Leyens C, Peters M. Titanium and Titanium Alloys-Fundamentals and Applications [M]. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., 2003
[13] Wang Y Z, Yuan H, Ding H S, et al. Effects of lamellar orientation on the fracture toughness of TiAl PST crystals [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 752A: 199
[14] Richards N L. Quantitative evaluation of fracture toughness-microstructural relationships in alpha-beta titanium alloys [J]. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2004, 13(2): 218
doi: 10.1361/10599490418424
[15] Lütjering G. Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (α + β) titanium alloys [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1998, 243A(1-2) : 32
[16] Wang H, Zhao Q Y, Xin S W, et al. Microstructural morphology effects on fracture toughness and crack growth behaviors in a high strength titanium alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 821A: 141626
[17] , Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials [S]. West Conshohocken: American Society of Testing and Materials, 2020
[18] Antonov S, Shi R P, Li D, et al. Nucleation and growth of α phase in a metastable β-Titanium Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr alloy: Influence from the nano-scale, ordered-orthorhombic O″ phase and α compositional evolution [J]. Scr. Mater., 2021, 194: 113672
doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113672
[19] Terlinde G, Rathjen H J, Schwalbe K H. Microstructure and fracture toughness of the aged β-Ti Alloy Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al [J]. Metall. Trans., 1988, 19A(4) : 1037
[20] Liu Y, Lim S C V, Ding C, et al. Unravelling the competitive effect of microstructural features on the fracture toughness and tensile properties of near beta titanium alloys [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2022, 97: 101
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.032
[21] Wang K, Li M Q. Effects of heat treatment and hot deformation on the secondary α phase evolution of TC8 titanium alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, 613A: 209
[22] Hu M, Dong L M, Zhang Z Q, et al. Effects of multi-pass drawing strain and heat treatment on microstructure, texture and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 757A: 70
[23] Zhang S, Lin Y C, He D G, et al. Correlation between plastic deformation mechanism and texture evolution of a near β-Ti alloy deformed in β region [J]. Intermetallics, 2024, 170: 108333
doi: 10.1016/j.intermet.2024.108333
[24] Ren Y, Li Z, Zhang Z Y, et al. Effect of grain size on the shock-induced response and spall fracture behavior of a metastable β titanium alloy subjected to repeated impact [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2022, 860A: 144320
[25] Bažant Z P, Planas J. Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997
[26] Anderson T L. Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications [M]. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017
[27] Li H F, Wang S G, Zhang P, et al. Crack propagation mechanisms of AISI 4340 steels with different strength and toughness [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 729A: 130
[28] Liu Z D, Du Z X, Jiang H Y, et al. Controlling the microstructure and fracture toughness of the Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy by multiple heat treatments [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2022, 17: 2528
doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.020
[29] Zhu W G, Lei J, Su B, et al. The interdependence of microstructure, strength and fracture toughness in a novel β titanium alloy Ti-5Al-4Zr-8Mo-7V [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, 782A: 139248
[30] He S T, Zeng W D, Xu J W, et al. The effects of microstructure evolution on the fracture toughness of BT-25 titanium alloy during isothermal forging and subsequent heat treatment [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 745A: 203
[31] Chan K S, Lee Y D. Effects of deformation-induced constraint on high-cycle fatigue in Ti alloys with a duplex microstructure [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2008, 39A(7) : 1665
[32] Tan C S, Sun Q Y, Xiao L, et al. Cyclic deformation and microcrack initiation during stress controlled high cycle fatigue of a titanium alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 711A: 212
[33] Gong J C, Wilkinson A J. Anisotropy in the plastic flow properties of single-crystal α titanium determined from micro-cantilever beams [J]. Acta Mater., 2009, 57(19): 5693
doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.064
[1] 胡明, 王啟睿, 邱建科, 雷晓飞, 张金虎, 董利民, 杨锐. 拉拔变形量对超高强钛合金棒材强塑性的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(8): 561-571.
[2] 杨垒, 尚学文, 田晓生, 高慧颖, 徐磊. 粉末冶金热等静压工艺成形TC11合金长时间热暴露后的力学性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(8): 572-582.
[3] 陈尧, 陈志勇, 柏春光. Ti2AlNb合金薄板的微观组织、织构和力学性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(8): 583-594.
[4] 张铭原, 闻明, 李思勰, 张滨, 张广平. 制备工艺参数对磁控溅射Ni5Pt薄膜的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(8): 613-623.
[5] 郑沁园, 郑成武, 路轶, 朱海龙, 刘朋, 栾义坤, 李殿中. 软化退火对冷轧中锰钢再结晶和相变的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 401-413.
[6] 高崇, 熊理晞, 陈子豪, 梁治智, 麻衡, 何康, 何金珊, 庞建超, 张哲峰. 临界退火工艺对500 MPa级风电用钢焊接接头断裂韧性的优化[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 414-424.
[7] 徐磊, 李若辰, 田晓生, 卢正冠. ЭП741粉末合金中的缺陷对力学性能的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 425-436.
[8] 邓智文, 贾春妮, 刘腾远, 路轶, 郑成武, 王培, 李殿中. 锰影响中锰钢TRIP效应的晶体塑性计算[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 437-449.
[9] 杨睿韬, 梁斌, 庞生洋, 胡成龙, 张伟, 樊俊铃, 汤素芳. BN粉体的结晶度对Cu-Si合金润湿行为的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 457-464.
[10] 赵欣宇, 刘恩泽, 张功, 赵媛, 宁礼奎, 信昕, 贾丹, 刘伟华, 谭政. DD10合金钎焊接头的力学性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 465-473.
[11] 郭威, 张月林, 曹梓恒, 李龙丰, 赵觅, 吴树森. 热处理温度对FeCrVTa0.1W0.1Ti0.1C0.17 多组元合金组织与性能的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(6): 474-480.
[12] 尹晓彤, 田雨欣, 冯盛, 李文颖, 王立兴, 张丽娜, 张伟. Sb2S3/Sn3O4 S型异质结构光催化剂的制备及其降解甲基橙的性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(5): 352-360.
[13] 张志凯, 雷佳双, 姚冰亚, 陈思雨, 刘硕, 孙玉伟, 汤茜. CuFe2O4/BaTiO3 复合材料的制备及其降解四环素的性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(5): 361-371.
[14] 吴望月, 刘心刚, 姜祥伟, 董加胜. Ta含量对DZ411合金疲劳裂纹扩展的影响[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(5): 385-394.
[15] 付芸迪, 申健, 黄亚奇, 卢玉章, 王栋. 一种低Re二代单晶高温合金长期时效后的性能[J]. 材料研究学报, 2026, 40(4): 241-253.