Please wait a minute...
Chinese Journal of Materials Research  2017, Vol. 31 Issue (2): 88-95    DOI: 10.11901/1005.3093.2016.234
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Preparation and Tensile-compressive Properties of Syntactic Foams of Epoxy Resin Filled with Fly Ash Cenospheres
Miaomiao LI,Ping CHEN(),Hui WANG,Jianchao LI
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Cite this article: 

Miaomiao LI,Ping CHEN,Hui WANG,Jianchao LI. Preparation and Tensile-compressive Properties of Syntactic Foams of Epoxy Resin Filled with Fly Ash Cenospheres. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2017, 31(2): 88-95.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4352KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

The tensile-compressive properties of syntactic foams of fly ash cenospheres/epoxy resin were measured by universal testing machine, and the fracture surface were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The effect of the content, particle size and gradation ratio of fly ash cenospheres on the tensile-compressive properties of the syntactic foam was investigated. The results show that the tensile strength and compressive strength of the syntactic foam increases first and then decreases with the increase of cenospheres content. The compressive strength of the syntactic foams reaches a maximum when the content of cenospheres is 15phr, while the tensile strength and compressive strength increase by 9.15% and 6.86% compared with pure epoxy resin respectively. For the same filling amount, the smaller the particle size of the cenospheres, the higher the tensile strength and compressive strength of the syntactic foam. The tensile strength and compressive strength of the syntactic foam filled with small size cenospheres (20 μm) increase 158.41% and 19.96% respectively over that of the syntactic foam filled with large size cenospheres (250 μm). The tensile strength and compressive strength of the syntactic foam filled with cenospheres of different grading ratios is mainly affected by the content of small size cenospheres. The more the content of small size cenospheres, the higher the tensile strength and compressive strength of the syntactic foam.

Key words:  composites      epoxy syntactic foam      tensile properties      compressive properties      fly ash cenospheres     
Received:  29 April 2016     
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51305023)

URL: 

https://www.cjmr.org/EN/10.11901/1005.3093.2016.234     OR     https://www.cjmr.org/EN/Y2017/V31/I2/88

Fig.1  Schematic diagram of cenospheres modification
Fig.2  SEM micrographs of modified cenospheres distribution in the epoxy
Sample number Cenospheres type Cenospheres content/phr Density/gcm-3
1 20 μm 0 1.206
2 20 μm 5 1.196
3 20 μm 10 1.155
4 20 μm 15 1.139
5 20 μμm 20 1.084
6 20 μm 25 1.076
7 250 μm 15 1.014
8 150 μm 15 1.039
9 54 μm 15 1.096
10 20 μm :54 μm =2:8 15 1.034
11 20 μm :54 μm =4:6 15 1.060
12 20 μm :54 μm =5:5 15 1.080
13 20 μm :54 μm =6:4 15 1.083
14 20 μm :54 μm =8:2 15 1.144
Table 1  Sample parameters
Fig.3  Influence of cenospheres content on stress-strain relationship for the cenospheres/epoxy resin syntactic foam (a) tensile stress-strain curve (b) compressive stress-strain curve
Fig.4  SEM micrographs of tensile fracture surface of epoxy resin filled with different cenospheres content (a) 0phr,(b) 5phr,(c) 10phr,(d) 15phr,(e) 20phr,(f) 25phr
Fig.5  SEM micrographs of agglomeration of cenospheres
Cenospheres content
/phr
Tensile strength
/MPa
Tensile modulus/MPa Compressive strength
/MPa
Compressive modulus /MPa
0 34.33 486.12 45.17 435.45
5 34.87 503.27 45.90 623.64
10 35.93 503.19 46.32 443.38
15 37.47 583.53 48.27 556.04
20 32.24 506.94 44.32 579.62
25 22.45 488.42 37.44 469.87
Table 2  Tensile and compressive properties of epoxy resin filled with different cenospheres content
Fig.6  Influence of cenospheres size on stress-strain relationship for the cenospheres/epoxy resin syntactic foam (a) tensile stress-strain curve (b) compressive stress-strain curve
Fig.7  SEM micrographs of tensile fracture surface of epoxy resin filled with different cenospheres size (a) 250 μm,(b) 150 μm,(c) 54 μm
Cenospheres size
/μm
Tensile strength
/MPa
Tensile modulus/MPa Compressive strength
/MPa
Compressive modulus /MPa
250 14.50 439.51 40.24 320.31
150 23.80 474.26 41.02 431.45
54 31.39 493.42 43.41 308.29
20 37.47 583.53 48.27 556.04
Table 3  Tensile and compressive properties of epoxy resin filled with different cenospheres size
Fig.8  Influence of cenospheres grading ratio on stress-strain relationship for the cenospheres/epoxy resin syntactic foam (a) tensile stress-strain curve (b) compressive stress-strain curve
Fig.9  SEM micrographs of tensile fracture surface of composites filled with different grading ratio (a) 2:8, (b) 4:6, (c) 5:5, (d) 6:4, (e) 8:2
Grading ratio
/20 μm:54 μm
Tensile strength
/MPa
Tensile
modulus /MPa
Compressive strength
/MPa
Compressive modulus /MPa
2:8 31.70 507.54 43.83 510.68
4:6 34.03 486.09 44.68 540.74
5:5 34.38 569.01 44.92 442.29
6:4 34.92 537.27 45.47 356.44
8:2 35.59 527.69 46.31 257.02
Table 4  Tensile and compressive properties of epoxy resin filled with different cenospheres grading ratio
[1] Wouterson E M, Boey F Y C, Wong S -C,et al. Nano-toughening versus micro-toughening of polymer syntactic foams[J]. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2007, 67(14): 2924
[2] Woldesenbet E.Low velocity impact properties of nanoparticulate syntactic foams[J]. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2008, 496(1-2): 217
[3] Yu M, Zhu P, Ma Y Q.Experimental study and numerical prediction of tensile strength properties and failure modes of hollow spheres filled syntactic foams[J]. Comp. Mater. Sci., 2012, 63: 232
[4] Bardella L, Malanca F, Ponzo P, et al.A micromechanical model for quasi-brittle compressive failure of glass-microballoons/thermoset-matrix syntactic foams[J]. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2014, 34(11): 2605
[5] Huang R X, Li P F.Elastic behaviour and failure mechanism in epoxy syntactic foams: The effect of glass microballoon volume fractions[J]. Compos. Part B-Eng., 2015, 78: 401
[6] Wouterson E M, Boey F Y C, Hu X, et al. Specific properties and fracture toughness of syntactic foam: Effect of foam microstructures[J]. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2005, 65(11-12): 1840
[7] Asif A, Rao L V, Ninan K N.Nanoclay reinforced thermoplastic toughened epoxy hybrid syntactic foam: Surface morphology, mechanical and thermo mechanical properties[J]. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct., 2010, 527(23): 6184
[8] Ferreira J A M, Capela C, Cost J D. A study of the mechanical behaviour on fibre reinforced hollow microspheres hybrid composites[J]. Compos Part A-Appl. S., 2010, 41(3): 345
[9] Swetha C, Kumar R.Quasi-static uni-axial compression behaviour of hollow glass microspheres/epoxy based syntactic foams[J]. Mater. Design, 2011, 32(8-9): 4152
[10] Jumahat A, Soutis C, Mahmud J, et al.Compressive properties of nanoclay/epoxy nanocomposites[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 41: 1607
[11] Tian A P, Yu W, Li D J.Compressive and flexural mechanical properties of foam Al-HGM/epoxy foam composite[J]. Acta. Mater. Compos. Sin., 2013, 30(4): 74
[11] (田爱平, 余为, 李东杰. 泡沫铝-空心玻璃微珠/环氧泡沫复合材料压缩及弯曲力学性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2013, 30(4): 74)
[12] Wang L J, Yang X, Zhang J, et al.The compressive properties of expandable microspheres/epoxy foams[J]. Compos. Part B-Eng., 2014, 56: 724
[13] Seaglar J, Rousseau C-E.Compressive evaluation of homogeneous and graded epoxy-glass particulate composites[J]. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater., 2015, 49: 727
[14] Panteghini A, Bardella L.On the compressive strength of glass microballoons-based syntactic foams[J]. Mech. Mater., 2015, 82: 63
[15] Nian G D, Shan Y J, Xu Q, et al.Failure analysis of syntactic foams: A computational model with cohesive law and XFEM[J]. Compos. Part B-Eng., 2016, 89: 18
[16] Sun T, Fan H Y, Wang Z, et al.Modified nano Fe2O3-epoxy composite with enhanced mechanical properties[J]. Mater. Design, 2015, 87: 10
[17] Derradji M, Ramdani N, Zhang T, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of phthalonitrile resin reinforced with silicon carbide particles[J]. Mater. Design, 2015, 71: 48
[18] Wang X, Wang L, Su Q, et al.Use of unmodified SiO2 as nanofiller to improve mechanical properties of polymer-based nanocomposites[J]. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2013, 89: 52
[19] Baheti V, Militky J, Mishra R, et al.Thermomechanical properties of glass fabric/epoxy composites filled with fly ash[J]. Compos. Part B-Eng., 2016, 85: 268
[20] Sharmila T K B, Antony J V, Jayakrishnan M P, et al. Mechanical, thermal and dielectric properties of hybrid composites of epoxy and reduced graphene oxide/iron oxide[J]. Mater. Design, 2016, 90: 60
[21] Li J N, Yu K J, Qian K, et al.Effect of graphene oxide-SiO2 hybrid materials on tensile properties of epoxy[J]. Acta. Mater. Compos. Sin., 2014, 31(5): 1192
[21] (李佳铌, 俞科静, 钱坤等. 氧化石墨烯-SiO2杂化材料对环氧树脂拉伸性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2014, 31(5): 1192)
[1] JI Yuchen, LIU Shuhe, ZHANG Tianyu, ZHA Cheng. Research Progress of MXene Used in Lithium Sulfur Battery[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(7): 481-494.
[2] ZHANG Tengxin, WANG Han, HAO Yabin, ZHANG Jiangang, SUN Xinyang, ZENG You. Damping Enhancement of Graphene/Polymer Composites Based on Interfacial Interactions of Hydrogen Bonds[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(6): 401-407.
[3] SHAO Mengmeng, CHEN Zhaoke, XIONG Xiang, ZENG Yi, WANG Duo, WANG Xuhui. Effect of Si2+ Ion Beam Irradiation on Performance of C/C-ZrC-SiC Composites[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(6): 472-480.
[4] MIAO Qi, ZUO Xiaoqing, ZHOU Yun, WANG Yingwu, GUO Lu, WANG Tan, HUANG Bei. Pore Structure, Mechanical and Sound Absorption Performance for Composite Foam of 304 Stainless Steel Fiber/ZL104 Aluminum Alloy[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(3): 175-183.
[5] LIN Shifeng, XU Dongan, ZHUANG Yanxin, ZHANG Haifeng, ZHU Zhengwang. Preparation and Mechanical Properties of TiZr-based Bulk Metallic Glass/TC21 Titanium Alloy Dual-layered Composites[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(3): 193-202.
[6] XIE Donghang, PAN Ran, ZHU Shize, WANG Dong, LIU Zhenyu, ZAN Yuning, XIAO Bolv, MA Zongyi. Effect of Reinforced Particle Size on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of B4C/Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Composites[J]. 材料研究学报, 2023, 37(10): 731-738.
[7] WANG Yankun, WANG Yu, JI Wei, WANG Zhihui, PENG Xiangfei, HU Yuxiong, LIU Bin, XU Hong, BAI Peikang. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fiber/Aluminum Laminated Composites[J]. 材料研究学报, 2022, 36(7): 536-544.
[8] ZONG Ping, LI Shiwei, CHEN Hong, MIAO Sainan, ZHANG Hui, LI Chao. In-situ Thermolysis Preparation of Carbon Capsulated Nano-copper and Its Stability[J]. 材料研究学报, 2022, 36(11): 829-836.
[9] ZONG Yixun, LI Shufeng, LIU Lei, ZHANG Xin, PAN Deng, WU Daihuiyu. Interface Regulation and Strengthening Mechanism of GNP-Ni/Cu Composites[J]. 材料研究学报, 2022, 36(10): 777-785.
[10] HOU Jing, YANG Peizhi, ZHENG Qinhong, YANG Wen, ZHOU Qihang, LI Xueming. Preparation and Performance of Graphite/TiO2 Composite Photocatalyst[J]. 材料研究学报, 2021, 35(9): 703-711.
[11] YANG Yana, CHEN Wenge, XUE Yuanlin. Interficial Bonding within Cu-based Composites Reinforced with TiC- or Ni-coated Carbon Fiber[J]. 材料研究学报, 2021, 35(6): 467-473.
[12] LI Wanxi, DU Yi'en, GUO Fang, CHEN Yongqiang. Preparation and Electromagnetic Properties of CoFe2O4-Co3Fe7 Nanoparticles and CoFe2O4/Porous Carbon[J]. 材料研究学报, 2021, 35(4): 302-312.
[13] HU Manying, OUYANG Delai, CUI Xia, DU Haiming, XU Yong. Properties of TiC Reinforced Ti-Composites Synthesized in Situ by Microwave Sintering[J]. 材料研究学报, 2021, 35(4): 277-283.
[14] SONG Yuehong, DAI Weili, XU Hui, ZHAO Jingzhe. Preparation and Photocatalytic Properties of g-C3N4/Bi12O17Cl2 Composites[J]. 材料研究学报, 2021, 35(12): 911-917.
[15] WANG Pengyu, ZHANG Haoyu, ZHANG Zhipeng, SUN Jie, XIE Guangming, CHENG Jun, CHEN Lijia. Effect of Solution Temperature on Microstructure and Tensile Properties of a Metastable β -Ti Alloy Ti-4Mo-6Cr-3Al-2Sn[J]. 材料研究学报, 2020, 34(6): 473-480.
No Suggested Reading articles found!